![]() ![]() I will simplify things by examining two of these meso topics, categoric units and groups, with an eye to whether further micro-translation is useful. But emergent sui generis principles internal to each realm are also given. The overall form of explanation is evolutionist. structural and cultural macro-settings, with transactional needs, statuses, and roles as micro-requirements), visualizing each meso realm as a niche subject to selection pressures from above and below. For each meso topic, Jon gives its macro and micro environments (i.e. Once you grasp the pattern, it is fairly easy to follow. Each topic has a similar checklist of subtopics in its causal chain, making for a fractal architecture of theory. more hierarchical or less hierarchical), so the actual number of principles is a little more than 18 (but each with long chains of conditions and subprinciples). All together, he has 36 principles of meso-dynamics, but many of these are paired inverse principles, positive and negative cases of the same variable (e.g. Volume 3 examines five meso topics: categoric units, groups, organizations, communities, and social movements. ![]() And if micro-dynamics change the macro realm, change will occur first at the level of corporate and categoric units (Vol. Meso provides the building blocks of stratification and intersocietal relations. Furthermore, most of the action in society actually happens at the meso level. ![]() Now Jon shows that meso can be analyzed with the same general procedures and right alongside macro and micro theories. Of course, sociologists studied meso-sized phenomena (organizations, social movements, etc.), but these tended to be self-contained research specialties. For a long time, as noted, all sociological theory was macro then micro-theory came on the scene, making bold claims. Turner (2013) also deserves credit for bringing the meso realm into general social theory. As noted, just re-describing something large by describing all the small encounters that went into it is tedious and not necessarily enlightening it could become enlightening if the larger levels are analyzed into operative micro principles that link its own (macro or meso) variables to differing (macro or meso) outcomes. Macro and Microsociology are perspectives for the study of sociological interactions in a human population on a large (Macro) scale or small (micro) scale.Jon Turner (2010a, 2010b) has made an important step towards showing whether micro (or, for that matter, other kinds of sui generis principles) are crucial building blocks at other levels. ![]() For example, the expectations of a teacher on students and their outcomes in grade, or family interactions and behavior in students. Microsociology does not make use of large data sets but instead includes interpretations of small interactions and how these would affect outcomes for these small groups. Examples of sizes would involve families, schools or small communities. Microsociology, on the other hand, is the study of individual interactions and small scale face to face interactions. Some examples of this may be economies in a country, the effects of an institution on a population or poverty. When studying macrosociology, the focus is on large collectives and big trends and patterns that can be drawn from statistics and data. These are two different perspectives for studying sociological trends in populations. Macro and Micro Sociology both have applications when studying sociology. Sociology is the study of human society it can be studied on a micro-scale concerning small face to face interactions or a large scale – macro – which studies populations and social structures. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |